Send the scope
We identify the missing site, plant, people and sequence information before drafting.
Construction-specific risk assessments, method statements and project plans developed from your scope, site constraints, sequence and controls—not recycled wording.
Discuss your requirements →A polished document is not automatically a suitable one. We focus on whether the work sequence is understood, the significant risks have been addressed and the controls are credible for the people delivering the activity.
If comments have already arrived, review the common reasons construction RAMS are rejected before resubmitting.
We identify the missing site, plant, people and sequence information before drafting.
Your delivery team checks that the proposed method reflects how the job will be done.
Changes are clear, traceable and incorporated before the document is briefed.
At minimum we need the work scope, sequence, location, people, plant, materials, interfaces and known site constraints. Higher-risk work may require designs, surveys, permits or specialist information.
Yes. We review the client comments and the underlying method, then identify what can be corrected and what needs clarification from the delivery team. Changes should reflect the real work rather than simply satisfy wording comments.
Yes. Under CDM 2015 a construction phase plan is required for every construction project before the construction phase begins. Its detail should be proportionate to the project and risks.